Assessing the Relevance of the Home Advantage in Sports Towards Meaningful Measurement Units
Main Article Content
Abstract
The continued interest of researchers in understanding the home advantage in sports has led to many different attempts in determining the meaningfulness of the effect. Specifically, it has been argued that the typically large sample sizes examined in this field jeopardize the meaningfulness of common statistical tests that are based on proportions. To combat this, scholars have recommended to focus on standardized effect size measures instead. While such unit-less measures allow for comparisons between studies, they do not reflect the actual units of measurement that players and coaches work with. Using the critical values of the associated equations alongside simulated data, this paper shows that hypothesis tests indeed yield significant results when the home teams win few additional points, while at the same time, effect size measures would require a large amount of additional points won by the home teams which rarely occurs in any sport to yield at least a small effect. Therefore, it is recommended to report results in relevant measurement units which are practically relevant like the average number of points won by the home teams alongside the common standardized test statistics to make the effect more tangible.
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
References
Boyko, R. H., Boyko, A. R., & Boyko, M. G. (2007). Referee bias contributes to home advantage in english premiership football. Journal of Sports Sciences, 25(11), 1185–1194. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410601038576
Buraimo, B., Forrest, D., & Simmons, R. (2010). The 12th man?: Refereeing bias in english and german soccer. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 173(2), 431–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2009.00604.x
Caso, S., Furley, P., & Jordet, G. (2025). Using video-notational analysis to examine soccer players’ behaviours. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2025.2477165
Courneya, K. S., & Carron, A. V. (1992). The home advantage in sport competitions: A literature review. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 14(1), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.14.1.13
Cuijpers, P. (2021). Has the time come to stop using the "standardised mean difference"? Clinical Psychology in Europe, 3(3), 6835. https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.6835
Dufner, A., Schütz, L., & Hill, Y. (2023). The introduction of the video assistant referee supports the fairness of the game – an analysis of the home advantage in the german bundesliga. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 66, 102386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2023.102386
Higgs, N., & Stavness, I. (2021). Bayesian analysis of home advantage in north american professional sports before and during COVID-19. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 14521. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93533-w
Hill, Y., & Yperen, N. W. (2021). Losing the home field advantage when playing behind closed doors during COVID-19: Change or chance? Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.658452
Jamieson, J. P. (2010). The home field advantage in athletics: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(7), 1819–1848. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00641.x
Kallogjeri, D., & Piccirillo, J. F. (2023). A simple guide to effect size measures. JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 149(5), 447–451. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2023.0159
Nevill, A. M., Balmer, N. J., & Williams, A. M. (2002). The influence of crowd noise and experience upon refereeing decisions in football. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 3(4), 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1469-0292(01)00033-4
Panzarella, E., Beribisky, N., & Cribbie, R. A. (2021). Denouncing the use of field-specific effect size distributions to inform magnitude [PeerJ 9:e11383]. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11383
Pollard, R. (1986). Home advantage in soccer: A retrospective analysis. Journal of Sports Sciences, 4(3), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640418608732122
Pollard, R., Bermejo, J. P., & Gómez, M. (2017). Global differences in home advantage by country, sport and sex. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 17(4), 586–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2017.1372164
Pollard, R., & Gómez, M. (2014). Comparison of home advantage in men’s and women’s football leagues in europe. European Journal of Sport Science, 14, 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2011.651490
Sors, F., Grassi, M., Agostini, T., & Murgia, M. (2021). The sound of silence in association football: Home advantage and referee bias decrease in matches played without spectators. European Journal of Sport Science, 21(12), 1597–1605. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2020.1845814
Sors, F., Grassi, M., Agostini, T., & Murgia, M. (2022). A complete season with attendance restrictions confirms the relevant contribution of spectators to home advantage and referee bias in association football. PeerJ, 10, 13681. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13681
Staufenbiel, K., Lobinger, B., & Strauß, B. (2015). Home advantage in soccer – a matter of expectations, goal setting and tactical decisions of coaches? Journal of Sports Sciences, 33(18), 1932–1941. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2015.1018929
Staufenbiel, K., Riedl, D., & Strauß, B. (2016). Learning to be advantaged: The development of home advantage in high-level youth soccer. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 16(1), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197x.2016.1142463