Changes in Bench Press Velocity and Power After 8 Weeks of High-Load Cluster or Traditional Set Structure A Replication Study

Main Article Content

Christopher B. Taber
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2446-311X
Jenny Murphy
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8624-3828
Jui Shah
https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7518-8361
S. Alex Long
https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9715-9290
Eric Lopatofsky

Abstract

This investigation was a replication of Davies et al. (2020), in which the effects of resistance training with divergent set structures were investigated in the barbell bench press (BP). Resistance-trained males (n = 16) and females (n = 9) participated in this study. Subjects completed eight weeks of training with traditional (TRAD) or cluster (CLUS) set structure. Testing was conducted pre- and post-training for maximal strength, mean and peak velocity and power, and load-velocity profiling. Mixed ANOVAs were conducted to assess differences in BP one repetition maximum (1RM) and mean and peak velocity and power with loads between 45% and 95% 1RM. A z-test was used to assess the compatibility of original and replication effect sizes for peak power at 45% 1RM. Unlike in the original study, the main effects for peak power were not statistically significant (p > 0.05); however, the original and replication effect sizes were compatible at 45% 1RM (z = 1.07, p = 0.14). In further contrast to the original findings, main time effects for peak velocity were not statistically significant at 55% or 65% 1RM (p > 0.05). Main time effects for mean velocity were partially replicated, as a statistically significant effect was observed at 65% (p = 0.014), but not at 55% 1RM (p > 0.05). The current results indicate that TRAD and CLUS set structures do not have robust effects on velocity and power in the BP, contradicting previous results. However, the TRAD and CLUS set structures investigated promote similar increases in maximal strength.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Taber, C. B., Murphy, J., Shah, J., Long, S. A., & Lopatofsky, E. (2025). Changes in Bench Press Velocity and Power After 8 Weeks of High-Load Cluster or Traditional Set Structure: A Replication Study . Communications in Kinesiology, 1(7). https://doi.org/10.51224/cik.2025.75
Section
Metascience

References

Arazi H, Khoshnoud A, Asadi A, Tufano JJ. The effect of resistance training set configuration on strength and muscular performance adaptations in male powerlifters. Scientific Reports 11: 7844, 2021.

Brandt MJ, IJzerman H, Dijksterhuis A, et al. The replication recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 50: 217-224, 2014.

Caldwell AR, Vigotsky AD, Tenan MS, et al. Moving sport and exercise science forward: a call for the adoption of more transparent research practices. Sports Medicine 50: 449-459, 2020.

Carroll KM, Bernards JR, Bazyler CD, et al. Divergent performance outcomes following resistance training using repetition maximums or relative intensity. International journal of sports physiology and performance 14: 46-54, 2019.

Chae S, Long SA, Lis RP, et al. Combined Accentuated Eccentric Loading and Rest Redistribution in High-Volume Back Squat: Acute Kinetics and Kinematics. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research: 10.1519, 2022.

Cooper I. Physical fitness assessments and norms for adults and law enforcement. Dallas, Tex: The Cooper Institute, 2007.

Davies TB, Halaki M, Orr R, Helms ER, Hackett DA. Changes in bench press velocity and power after 8 weeks of high-load cluster-or traditional-set structures. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research 34: 2734-2742, 2020.

Davies TB, Tran DL, Hogan CM, Haff GG, Latella C. Chronic effects of altering resistance training set configurations using cluster sets: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Medicine 51: 707-736, 2021.

Dias RMR, Cyrino ES, Salvador EP, et al. Impact of an eight-week weight training program on the muscular strength of men and women. Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte 11: 224-228, 2005.

García-Ramos A, González-Hernández JM, Baños-Pelegrín E, et al. Mechanical and metabolic responses to traditional and cluster set configurations in the bench press exercise. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research 34: 663-670, 2020.

Haff GG, Burgess S, Stone MH. Cluster training: theoretical and practical applications for the strength and conditioning professional. Prof Strength Cond 12: 12-17, 2008.

Haff GG, Nimphius S. Training principles for power. Strength & Conditioning Journal 34: 2-12, 2012.

Hopkins W, Marshall S, Batterham A, Hanin J. Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Medicine+ Science in Sports+ Exercise 41: 3, 2009.

Kawamori N, Haff GG. The optimal training load for the development of muscular power. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research 18: 675-684, 2004.

Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of chiropractic medicine 15: 155-163, 2016.

Latella C, Teo W-P, Drinkwater EJ, Kendall K, Haff GG. The acute neuromuscular responses to cluster set resistance training: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Medicine 49: 1861-1877, 2019.

Lawton T, Cronin J, Drinkwater E, Lindsell R, Pyne D. The effect of continuous repetition training and intra-set rest training on bench press strength and power. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 44: 361-367, 2004.

Murphy J, Mesquida C, Caldwell AR, Earp BD, Warne JP. Proposal of a selection protocol for replication of studies in sports and exercise science. Sports medicine 53: 281-291, 2023.

Nosek BA, Errington TM. What is replication? PLoS biology 18: e3000691, 2020.

Oliver JM, Jagim AR, Sanchez AC, et al. Greater gains in strength and power with intraset rest intervals in hypertrophic training. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research 27: 3116-3131, 2013.

Orange ST, Metcalfe JW, Marshall P, et al. Test-retest reliability of a commercial linear position transducer (GymAware PowerTool) to measure velocity and power in the back squat and bench press. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research 34: 728-737, 2020.

Piqueras-Sanchiz F, Cornejo-Daza PJ, Sánchez-Valdepeñas J, et al. Acute mechanical, neuromuscular, and metabolic responses to different set configurations in resistance training. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research 36: 2983-2991, 2022.

Sánchez-Moreno M, Rodiles-Guerrero L, Rendeiro-Pinho G, Prieto-Veloso A, Pareja-Blanco F. Acute Mechanical and Metabolic Responses to Different Resistance Training Protocols With Equated Volume Load. International journal of sports physiology and performance 18: 402-413, 2023.

Schlegelmilch R. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science 349: aac4716-aac4716, 2015.

Stone MH, Hornsby WG, Suarez DG, Duca M, Pierce KC. Training specificity for athletes: Emphasis on strength-power training: A narrative review. Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology 7: 102, 2022.

Stone MH, Wilson D, Rozenek R, Newton H. Anaerobic capacity: physiological basis. Strength & Conditioning Journal 5: 40-40, 1983.

Suchomel TJ, Comfort P. Developing muscular strength and power. In: Advanced Strength and Conditioning. Routledge, 2022, 13-39.

Taber C, Bellon C, Abbott H, Bingham GE. Roles of maximal strength and rate of force development in maximizing muscular power. Strength & Conditioning Journal 38: 71-78, 2016.

Wetmore AB, Wagle JP, Sams ML, et al. Cluster set loading in the back squat: kinetic and kinematic implications. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research 33: S19-S25, 2019.