Are Single Limb Hopping Scores the Same When Performed in a Physical Education Class Versus a Laboratory Setting in Uninjured Adolescents? Implications for Future Rehabilitation Guidelines for Adolescents With Knee Injuries

Main Article Content

Céline I. Girard
Michael Del Bel
Virginie Bédard
Caroline Bradley
Andrea Comptour
Kelly O'Connor
Sasha Carsen
Daniel L. Benoit


This study compared the performance of adolescents (11-13 years old) in two environments with five single-limb hopping tasks. The purpose was to assess the reproducibility and responsiveness of single-limb hop tests in two environments (gymnasium and laboratory) for uninjured adolescents, and determine whether there are differences in baseline measures between males and females. Thirty-four participants (12 ± 0.3 years) were randomly assigned the gymnasium during a regularly scheduled physical education class or the laboratory and completed five single-limb hop tasks. Two weeks later, participants completed the tasks in the other location. The performances were evaluated for reproducibility (intra-class correlation coefficients [ICC], and standard errors of measurement [SEM]), and responsiveness (Bland-Altman analyses [BA], and smallest real difference [SRD]). Limb symmetry indices (LSI) were also calculated for each task. Two-way mixed ANOVAs examined location and sex differences. All hops were reproducible (ICC = 0.62-0.88) with SEMs ranging between 6.7-13.0% of the mean of the group. BA showed location differences for the triple hop on the dominant limb (d = -13.3 cm, p=0.03). SRDs ranged between 18.5-35.9% of the mean of the group for all hops. Males scored higher (percent difference (%D) = 9.9-21.4%, p<0.05) for all hops except the anterior hop on both limbs, the 6-meter timed hop and lateral hop on the non-dominant limb. LSIs were 93.5-102.6% and 94.4-101.7% for all hopping task for females and males, respectively. In conclusion, this battery of single-limb hop tests offer a reliable method for clinicians and researchers to assess the functional capacity of uninjured adolescents in various environments.


Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Girard, C. I., Del Bel, M., Bédard, V., Bradley, C., Comptour, A., O’Connor, K., … Benoit, D. L. (2024). Are Single Limb Hopping Scores the Same When Performed in a Physical Education Class Versus a Laboratory Setting in Uninjured Adolescents? Implications for Future Rehabilitation Guidelines for Adolescents With Knee Injuries. Communications in Kinesiology, 1(6).
Training and Performance Analysis


The National Federation of State High School Association. 2018-19 High School Athletic Participation Survery. 2019.

Werner BC, Yang S, Looney AM, et al. Trends in Pediatric and Adolescent Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury and Reconstruction. J Pediatr Orthop. 2016;36:447–452.

Hootman JM, Dick R, Agel J. Epidemiology of collegiate injuries for 15 sports: Summary and recommendations for injury prevention initiatives. J Athl Train. 2007:311–319.

Salmon L, Russell V, Musgrove T, et al. Incidence and risk factors for graft rupture and contralateral rupture after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2005;21:948–957.

Fernandez WG, Yard EE, Comstock RD. Epidemiology of Lower Extremity Injuries among U.S. High School Athletes. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14:641–645. Doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2007.tb01851.x.

Cristiani R, Mikkelsen C, Edman G, et al. Age, gender, quadriceps strength and hop test performance are the most important factors affecting the achievement of a patient-acceptable symptom state after ACL reconstruction. Knee Surgery, Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020;28:369–380.

Mattacola CG, Perrin DH, Gansneder BM, et al. Strength, functional outcome, and postural stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Athl Train. 2002;37:262–268.

Sharma N, Sharma A, Sandhu JS. Functional Performance Testing in Athletes with Functional Ankle Instability. Asian J Sports Med. 2011;2:249–258.

Noyes FR, Barber SDS, Mangine RRE. Abnormal Lower Limb Symmetry Determined by Function Hop Tests After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture. Am J Sports Med. 1991;19:513–518.

Barber SD, Noyes FR, Mangine RE, et al. Quantitative assessment of functional limitations in normal and anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;255:204–214.

Dingenen B, Truijen J, Bellemans J, et al. Test-retest reliability and discriminative ability of forward, medial and rotational single-leg hop tests. Knee. 2019;26:978–987.

Ross MD, Langford B, Whelan P. Test-retest reliability of 4 single-leg horizontal hop tests. J Strength Cond Res. 2002;16:617–622.

Davies GJ, McCarty E, Provencher M, et al. ACL Return to Sport Guidelines and Criteria. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017;10:307–314.

Borotikar BS, Newcomer R, Koppes R, et al. Combined effects of fatigue and decision making on female lower limb landing postures: Central and peripheral contributions to ACL injury risk. Clin Biomech. 2008;23:81–92.

Brown TN, Palmieri-Smith RM, McLean SG. Sex and limb differences in hip and knee kinematics and kinetics during anticipated and unanticipated jump landings: Implications for anterior cruciate ligament injury. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43:1049–1056.

Johnson MR, Stoneman PD. Comparison of a Lateral Hop Test Versus a Forward Hop Test for Functional Evaluation of Lateral Ankle Sprains. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2007;46:162–174.

Munro AG, Herrington LC. Between-session reliability of four hop tests and the Agility T-test. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25:1470–1477.

Barber-Westin SD, Noyes FR. Factors Used to Determine Return to Unrestricted Sports Activities After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2011;27:1697–1705.

Girard CI, Warren CE, Romanchuk NJ, et al. Decision Tree Learning Algorithm for Classifying Knee Injury Status Using Return-to-Activity Criteria. Proc. Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. EMBS, vol. 2020- July: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.; 2020: 5494–5497.

Mulrey CR, Shultz SJ, Ford KR, et al. Methods of identifying limb dominance in adolescent female basketball players: Implications for clinical and biomechanical research. J Sports Med. 2020;30:279–281.

Labella CR, Hennrikus WL, Hewett TE. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries : Diagnosis , Treatment , and Prevention. Pediatrics. 2014;133:e1437–e1450.

Fabricant PD, Robles A, Downey-Zayas T, et al. Development and Validation of a Pediatric Sports Activity Rating Scale. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41:2421–2429.

DelBel MJ, Kemp LG, Girard CI, et al. Translation and Validation of the Hospital for Special Surgery Pediatric Functional Activity Brief Scale for French Paediatric Populations. Physiother Canada. 2020:e20190033.

Marshall WA, Tanner JM. Variations in pattern of pubertal changes in girls. Arch Dis Child. 1969;44:291–303.

Marshall WA, Tanner JM. Variations in the pattern of pubertal changes in boys. Arch Dis Child. 1970;45:13–23.

van Melick N, Meddeler BM, Hoogeboom TJ, et al. How to determine leg dominance: The agreement between self-reported and observed performance in healthy adults. PLoS One. 2017;12:1–9. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189876.

DeVet HCW, Terwee CB, Knol DL, et al. When to use agreement versus reliability measures. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59:1033–1039.

Fleiss JL. The design and analysis of clinical experiments. vol. 73. John Wiley & Sons; 2011.

Lexell JE, Downham DY. How to Assess the Reliability of Measurements in Rehabilitation The Sports-Related Injuries and Illnesses in Paralympic Sport Study (SRIIPSS) View project. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;84:719–723.

Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;327:307–310.

Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G. Measuring change over time: Assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:171–178.

Beckerman H, Roebroeck ME, Lankhorst GJ, et al. Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness. Qual Life Res. 2001;10:571–578.

Abrams GD, Harris JD, Gupta AK, et al. Functional Performance Testing After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review. Orthop J Sport Med. 2014;2:1–10.

Lai K, Kelley K. Accuracy in parameter estimation for targeted effects in structural equation modeling: Sample size planning for narrow confidence intervals. Psychol Methods. 2011;16:127–148. Doi: 10.1037/a0021764.

Atkinson G, Nevill AM. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sport Med. 1998;26:217–238.

Schmitt LC, Paterno M V., Ford KR, et al. Strength Asymmetry and Landing Mechanics at Return to Sport after ACL Reconstruction. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015;47:1426–1434.

Toole AR, Ithurburn MP, Rauh MJ, et al. Young athletes cleared for sports participation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: How many actually meet recommended return-to-sport criterion cutoffs? J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017;47:825–833. Doi: 10.2519/jospt.2017.7227.

Kivlan BR, Martin RL. Functional Performance Testing of the Hip in Athletes: A Systematic Review for Reliability and Validity. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012;7:402–412.

van Grinsven S, van Cingel REH, Holla CJM, et al. Evidence-based rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surgery, Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18:1128–1144.

Deaner RO, Geary DC, Puts DA, et al. A Sex Difference in the Predisposition for Physical Competition: Males Play Sports Much More than Females Even in the Contemporary U.S. PLoS One. 2012;7:e49168.